# Bechtel v. . Weaver

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · June 15, 1932 · 202 N.C. 856

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3660004

## Case

- **Full name:** JOHN A. BECHTEL v. D. J. WEAVER Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** June 15, 1932
- **Citations:** 202 N.C. 856; 164 S.E. 338; 1932 N.C. LEXIS 286
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3660004

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that, “as the sale which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin has already taken place, there is nothing now to restrain, and the action was properly dismissed”

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained
(Brown v. Polk,
201 N. C., 375 , 160 S. E., 357 ), still the correct result has been reached in another way, and the judgment will not be disturbed.
Bank v. McCullers,
201 N. C., 440 ;
Rankin v. Oates,
183 N. C., 517 , 112 S. E., 32 . “A new trial will not he granted when the action of the trial judge, even if erroneous, could by no possibility injure the appellant.”
Butts v. Screws,
95 N. C., 215 .
This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to consider defendants’ appeal.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3660004. Public record. Not legal advice.