# Shah v. Howard Johnson

> North Carolina Industrial Commission · March 23, 1999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3637124

## Case

- **Full name:** Bharat Shah, Employee v. Howard Johnson, Employer, Self-Insured (Key Risk Management Services, Servicing Agent)
- **Court:** North Carolina Industrial Commission
- **Decided:** March 23, 1999
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** <center>          OPINION AND AWARD Written for the Full Commission by Commissioner LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC, with Commissioner RENEE C. RIGGSBEE CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART.</center>
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3637124

## Opinion text

In my opinion, defendant did not violate G.S. § 97-18 (d). Defendant's use of the Form 63 payment without prejudice procedure was proper; the imposition of sanctions is, therefore, error.
I concur with the majority in all other respects.
S/_____________ RENEE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3637124. Public record. Not legal advice.