# Town of Irvington v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · October 20, 1930 · 107 N.J.L. 191

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3564487

## Case

- **Full name:** The Town of Irvington and Alice M. Stewart, Appellants, v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** October 20, 1930
- **Citations:** 107 N.J.L. 191; 152 A. 921; 1930 N.J. LEXIS 287
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3564487

## Opinion text

Pee Curiam.
This case was one on four separate
certioraris
in the Supreme Court, which were consolidated there for the purpose of procedure and disposition. The opinion of the Supreme Court
per curiam
was written in that of Borough of Roselle Park et al.
v.
Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Public Service Railway Company and Public Service Transportation Company. After the entry of judgment in the Supreme Court adjudging that the order of the board be affirmed and the
certioraris
dismissed, an appeal was taken to this court by the town of Irvington and Alice M. Stewart, prosecutors-appellants in one of the writs against the defendants heretofore mentioned.
We are of opinion that the judgment under review herein, so far as it affects the town of Irvington and Alice M. Stewart, the prosecutors-appellants, should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance
— The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Yan Buskirk, MgGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal
— Kone.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3564487. Public record. Not legal advice.