# Marlyn Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of West Orange

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929 · 106 N.J.L. 573

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3563427

## Case

- **Full name:** Marlyn Realty Company, Appellant, v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Town of West Orange, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** May 20, 1929
- **Citations:** 106 N.J.L. 573; 146 A. 320; 1929 N.J. LEXIS 195
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3563427

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The Marlyn Realty Company was the owner of a tract of land located in the town of West Orange. Desiring to erect upon this tract a one-story building, to contain seven retail stores, it applied to the building inspector for a permit to do so. The application was denied upon the ground that such a building in that location was prohibited by the zoning ordinance of the municipality. The Marlyn Realty Company then appealed to the board of adjustment to review the action of the building superintendent, and the board affirmed that action. A
certiorari
was then applied for and allowed, and the Supreme Court, on the first day of May, 1928, filed an opinion holding that the action of the building inspector and the zoning board should be affirmed, and from the judgment of affirmance the present appeal is taken.
This case in its legal aspect is identical with that of
Steinberg
v.
Board of Adjustment of Nutley,
post,
p.
603, and, for the reasons stated in the
per curiam
filed in that case, the judgment under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance
— The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal
— None.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3563427. Public record. Not legal advice.