# City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · October 2, 1936 · 117 N.J.L. 119

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3557832

## Case

- **Full name:** City of Hoboken, Prosecutor, v. State Board of Tax Appeals and Hoboken Land and Improvement Company, a Corporation, Defendants; George Compton, David R. Smith, Mahlon R. Margerum and Thelma Parkinson, Members of State Board of Tax Appeals, Proponents-Appellants, v. City of Hoboken, Prosecutor-Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** October 2, 1936
- **Citations:** 117 N.J.L. 119; 187 A. 164; 1936 N.J. LEXIS 321
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3557832

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court refusing to quash certain subpoenas requiring the appellants, who were members of the state board of tax appeals, to appear and testify as witnesses before a Supreme- Court commissioner under a rule to take depositions, which was allowed in
certiorari
proceedings.
We conclude that the appeal should be dismissed on the authority of
In re Donald & Healy,
87
N. J. L.
691, wherein this court held that an appeal of this nature was an attempt to review the action of the Supreme Court with reference to its own process, and therefore such action was not appealable.
The appeal will be dismissed.
For dismissal
— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 9.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3557832. Public record. Not legal advice.