# Robin v. Walsh

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · January 10, 1944 · 16 So. 2d 269

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3479257

## Case

- **Full name:** Robin v. Walsh
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** January 10, 1944
- **Citations:** 16 So. 2d 269
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence
- **Judges:** McCALEB, Judge.
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3479257

## Opinion text

I think that McGinty v. Succession of Henderson, 41 La.Ann. 382 , 6 So. 658 , and Rassat v. Vegas, 173 La.Ann. 778 , 138 So. 665 , cannot be reconciled, and that therefore the latter and later case in effect overrules the former earlier case, and I think too that the rule which is established by the Rassat case is that there cannot be parol proof establishing the fact that a payment was intended as an acknowledgment of the debt but that if there is a written acknowledgment that some debt is due, there may be parol evidence identifying the acknowledgment with some particular debt.
I therefore concur. *Page 276

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3479257. Public record. Not legal advice.