# Childs v. Schlitz

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 22, 1977 · 556 F.2d 1178

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/346659

## Case

- **Full name:** John C. Childs, Lester Matz and Jerome B. Wolff v. Paul R. Schlitz, Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Individually, and in His Official Capacity
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 22, 1977
- **Citations:** 556 F.2d 1178
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/346659

## Opinion text

556 F.2d 1178
John C. CHILDS et al., Plaintiffs,
Lester Matz and Jerome B. Wolff, Appellants,
v.
Paul R. SCHLITZ, Clerk, United States District Court for the
District of Maryland, Individually, and in his
official capacity, et al., Appellees.
No. 76-2417.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1977.
Decided June 22, 1977.
Paul F. Strain, Baltimore, Md. (Arnold M. Weiner and J. Frederick Motz, Baltimore, Md., on brief) for appellants.
Robert J. Aumiller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Md. (Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen. Jon F. Oster, Deputy Atty. Gen. of Md., Baltimore, Md., on brief) for appellees.
Before WINTER, BUTZNER and HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Given immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 6002 and required to testify in a criminal case, Lester Matz and Jerome B. Wolff, both professional engineers, asserted in the district court that the Maryland Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors could not properly consider such testimony in determining whether to revoke their licenses to practice their profession. To do so, they assert, would violate their rights under the fifth amendment and the protection afforded by the federal immunity statute.
2
In a well reasoned opinion, the district court correctly rejected plaintiffs' contentions. Childs v. McCord, 420 F.Supp. 428 (D.Md.1976). We adopt the opinion as our own and affirm the judgment.
3
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/346659. Public record. Not legal advice.