# Stewart v. Stewart

> Supreme Court of Florida · November 26, 1946 · 158 Fla. 326

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3395039

## Case

- **Full name:** Jacqueline Archer Stewart v. Glenn Stewart
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** November 26, 1946
- **Citations:** 158 Fla. 326; 29 So. 2d 247; 170 A.L.R. 1073; 1946 Fla. LEXIS 577
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Buford
- **Judges:** Thomas, Chapman, Brown, Barns, Terrell, Adams, Buford, Fabisinski
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3395039

## Opinion text

BUFORD,
concurring specially:
I concur in what is said and in the conclusion reached in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice BARNS on rehearing granted; but, in addition thereto I am constrained to say that I have carefully studied the record and, as I see it, the record contains a great deal of testimony pro and con which is strong enough to create a very substantial suspicion that the plaintiff has been guilty of adultery but I think the record fails to reveal any
substantial legal
evidence to
establish
the
fact
that he was guilty of adultery. «
*329
For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, and also for this additional reason, I concur in the view that the decree of the Chancellor should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3395039. Public record. Not legal advice.