# Hulst v. State

> Supreme Court of Florida · March 23, 1936 · 123 Fla. 315

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3384649

## Case

- **Full name:** Mahlon Hulst v. State.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** March 23, 1936
- **Citations:** 123 Fla. 315; 166 So. 828; 1936 Fla. LEXIS 977
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Whitfield, Ellis, Buford, Davis, Terrell, Brown
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3384649

## Opinion text

Brown, J.
(dissenting). — Considering the charge as a whole, I do not think any reversible error appears. So considered, it was fair to the defendant and not calculated to mislead the jury. Nor does the record show that the defendant objected or excepted to any portion of the charge, or to the charge as a whole, and the motion for new trial does not sufficiently identify the portions of the charge which are now claimed to be erroneous. Nussbaumer v. State, 54 Fla. 87 , . 44 So. 712 ; Richardson v. State, 100 Fla. 835 , 130 So. 718 , Shepherd v. State, 36 Fla. 374 , 18 So. 773 . The statute requires this, Sec. 4367, C. G. L.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3384649. Public record. Not legal advice.