# Ago

> Florida Attorney General Reports · February 11, 1974

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3376074

## Case

- **Full name:** Thomas G. Freeman, Winter Springs City Attorney, Altamonte Springs
- **Court:** Florida Attorney General Reports
- **Decided:** February 11, 1974
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General Prepared by: Jan Dunn, Assistant Attorney General
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3376074

## Opinion text

QUESTION:
Can elected officials, prior to taking office, violate the Sunshine Law without liability?
SUMMARY:
Members-elect of boards and commissions are within the scope of the Sunshine Law. There must be proof of scienter in order for there to be criminal liability.
Your question is answered by Hough v. Stembridge, 278 So.2d 288 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1973). The court held that "members-elect of boards, commissions, agencies, etc. are within the scope of the Government in the Sunshine Law." Hough at 289 .
In order for there to be a criminal violation of the statute, there must be proof of scienter. The Supreme Court, in Board of Public Instruction of Broward Co. v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla. 1969), stated that
"Subsection (3) of Fla. Stat., s. 286.011 , F.S.A., provides that any person who violates the provisions of the act by attending a meeting not held in accordance with the provisions hereof, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Defendant complains because scienter was not made a specific element of the offense. We construe the statute to impliedly require a charge and proof of scienter."

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3376074. Public record. Not legal advice.