# Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)

> California Supreme Court · July 17, 1889 · 79 Cal. 633

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3308138

## Case

- **Full name:** Sarah Althea Sharon v. Fred-Erick W. Sharon, Etc., of William Sharon
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 17, 1889
- **Citations:** 79 Cal. 633; 22 P. 26; 1889 Cal. LEXIS 789
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence
- **Judges:** McFarland, Paterson, Fox, Works
- **Cited by:** 134 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Limited by Wixson v. Devine, 80 Cal. 385 (1889).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3308138

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating a party must make a supplemental disclosure “if the party learns 23 that in some material respect the disclosure or response is incomplete or incorrect” unless 24 “the additional or corrective information has . . . otherwise been made known to the other 25 parties duri…

## Opinion text

McFarland, J., concurring.
—I concur in the judgment. I also concur in all the points decided in the opinion of Mr. Justice Works, and in nearly everything that is said in that opinion. It is barely possible, however, that the opinion might be construed as indicating that the decision of this court on the appeal from the ( judgment was correct,—that is, that the findings support the judgment of the court below, and that its invalidity appears only upon a review of the evidence upon this appeal from the order denying a new trial. I could not
*682
concur in that view. I am as fully convinced now as I was on the other appeal that the findings present a case of logical
felo de se;
and show conclusively on their face that the parties did
not
commence “living and cohabiting together in the way usual with married people,” and had
not “
mutually assumed toward each other marital rights, duties, and obligations.”' In all other respects I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Works.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3308138. Public record. Not legal advice.