# People v. Mayen

> California Supreme Court · February 21, 1922 · 188 Cal. 237

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307560

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FRED H. MAYEN, Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 21, 1922
- **Citations:** 188 Cal. 237; 205 P. 435; 24 A.L.R. 1383; 1922 Cal. LEXIS 417
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wilbur
- **Judges:** Wilbur, Sloane
- **Cited by:** 132 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Overruled in part by People v. Matteson, 61 Cal. 2d 466 (1964).
- Negative treatments: 2
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307560

## Opinion text

WILBUR, J., Concurring.
I concur.
In regard to the question of whether or not the conduct of the district attorney resulted in a miscarriage of justice, I think it should be stated that in imposing sentence the trial judge provided that the terms should run concurrently, so that the conviction upon the Weiss count does not in
*261
crease the term of imprisonment, and I am somewhat influenced in my conclusion that there has been no prejudicial error by this fact in addition to those stated by Justice Sloane.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307560. Public record. Not legal advice.