# Van Loenen v. Gillespie

> California Supreme Court · October 22, 1907 · 152 Cal. 222

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307006

## Case

- **Full name:** WILLIAM VAN LOENEN Et Al., Respondents, v. FRANK GILLESPIE Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 22, 1907
- **Citations:** 152 Cal. 222; 96 P. 87; 1907 Cal. LEXIS 332
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Henshaw
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307006

## Opinion text

THE COURT.
It is ordered that the opinion heretofore rendered by this court in Department Two in this case is adopted as the opinion by the court in Bank, and judgment affirmed accordingly.
Shaw, J., and Lorigan, J., dissented for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in
Woollacott
v.
Meekins,
151 Cal. 701 , heretofore denied by the court in Bank:—
The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on the fourth day of April, 1907, and adopted by the court in Bank:—

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3307006. Public record. Not legal advice.