# E.D. & A.L. Stone Co. v. Reilly

> California Supreme Court · October 3, 1910 · 158 Cal. 466

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3306512

## Case

- **Full name:** E. D. AND A. L. STONE COMPANY (A Corporation) , Appellant, v. PHILLIP REILLY Et Al., Constituting the Elmhurst Sanitary Board of the Elmhurst Sanitary District, Etc., Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 3, 1910
- **Citations:** 158 Cal. 466; 111 P. 373; 1910 Cal. LEXIS 404
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** THE COURT.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3306512

## Opinion text

THE COURT.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, a property-owner within the limits of the Elmhurst Sanitary District, to enjoin the defendants, members of the sanitary board of said district, from issuing bonds of the district to the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars, or from making or carrying out any contracts for the construction of a sewer system for said district. The court entered judgment in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
The facts concerning the
status
of said district and its right
*467
to make contracts or issue bonds are, in effect, the same as those disclosed in the
Matter of the Petition of the Sanitary Board of the East Fruitvale Sanitary District,
(S. F. No. 5575),
ante,
p. 453, [ 111 Pac. 368 ], and upon the authority of that case it must be held that the sanitary district was dis-0 solved and the powers of its sanitary board terminated upon the annexation of the district to the city of Oaldand.
The judgment is reversed, with directions to the trial court to enter a judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in its complaint.
Rehearing denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3306512. Public record. Not legal advice.