# In Re Gilstrap

> California Supreme Court · September 30, 1915 · 171 Cal. 108

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3305096

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Charles Gilstrap, on Habeas Corpus.
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 30, 1915
- **Citations:** 171 Cal. 108; 152 P. 42; 1915 Cal. LEXIS 598
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Angellotti
- **Judges:** Angellotti, Shaw, Lawlor
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3305096

## Opinion text

ANGELLOTTI, C. J., Concurring.
I concur in the judgment, and generally in the views expressed in the opinion of Justice Lawlor. That the act involved was intended solely as a regulatory measure designed to regulate the business of
*123
selling ‘ ‘ drugs, nostrums, ointments or any appliances for the treatment of diseases, deformities, or injuries” by
itinerant venders
is very clear to me. I am also satisfied that it cannot be held as matter of law that the legislative judgment as to the amount of fee or charge reasonably necessary for the regulation of
that
business, viz.: one hundred dollars for each half year, is wrong.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3305096. Public record. Not legal advice.