# Ex Parte Helm

> California Supreme Court · June 14, 1904 · 143 Cal. 553

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304934

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte A. T. HELM, on Habeas Corpus
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 14, 1904
- **Citations:** 143 Cal. 553; 77 P. 453; 1904 Cal. LEXIS 858
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Van Dyke
- **Judges:** Angellotti, Van Dyke, Beatty
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304934

## Opinion text

*558
VAN DYKE, J., concurring.
I concur in the foregoing opinion on the ground that
Ex parte Braun,
141 Cal. 204 , has definitely settled the question that a license imposed by a city or town for revenue is a municipal affair, within the meaning of section 6 of article XI of the constitution, and therefore not subject to or controlled by general laws.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304934. Public record. Not legal advice.