# Locke v. Locke

> California Supreme Court · February 13, 1908 · 153 Cal. 56

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304588

## Case

- **Full name:** CARRIE E. LOCKE, Appellant, v. WILLIAM C. LOCKE, Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 13, 1908
- **Citations:** 153 Cal. 56; 94 P. 244; 1908 Cal. LEXIS 417
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Shaw
- **Judges:** Shaw, McFarland
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304588

## Opinion text

SHAW, J., concurring
concur in the judgment. During I the time the plaintiff supported herself she had no cause of action for divorce on the ground of non-support.
(Washburn
v.
Washburn,
9. Cal. 476;
Rycraft
v.
Rycraft,
42 Cal. 445 .) The delay during that time to begin the action could not affect the case, for she then had no right of action. The cause of action she had was for non-support during the year ending in October, 1906. She began the action therefor on November 8, 1906.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304588. Public record. Not legal advice.