# Roche v. Baldwin

> California Supreme Court · February 18, 1902 · 135 Cal. 522

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304166

## Case

- **Full name:** ALBERT T. ROCHE, Respondent, v. E. J. BALDWIN, Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 18, 1902
- **Citations:** 135 Cal. 522; 65 P. 459; 1902 Cal. LEXIS 837
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Henshaw, McFARLAND, Temple, Van Dyke
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304166

## Opinion text

I dissent, and adhere to the opinion delivered in Department. I think that the judgment should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3304166. Public record. Not legal advice.