# Brown v. City of Los Angeles

> California Supreme Court · October 1, 1920 · 183 Cal. 783

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3303269

## Case

- **Full name:** W. A. BROWN, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (A Municipal Corporation), Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 1, 1920
- **Citations:** 183 Cal. 783; 192 P. 716; 1920 Cal. LEXIS 472
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Angellotti
- **Judges:** Angellotti, Wilbur
- **Cited by:** 40 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3303269

## Opinion text

ANGELLOTTI, C. J., Concurring.
I concur. To my mind a very different case would be presented if petitioner were seeking to maintain an undertaking establishment in a different section of the city near one of. the smaller permissive “one-lot” zones, and in a place between which and such permissive zone there was no material difference. He might then well complain that the ordinance illegally discriminated against him. But such is not his situation, as, is fully shown by the opinion of Justice Wilbur.
Shaw, J., and Olney, J., concurred.
Rehearing denied.
All the Justices, except Shaw, J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3303269. Public record. Not legal advice.