# Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.

> California Supreme Court · November 17, 1916 · 173 Cal. 674

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3302747

## Case

- **Full name:** IMPERIAL LAND COMPANY (A Corporation), Et Al., Respondents, v. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 17, 1916
- **Citations:** 173 Cal. 674; 161 P. 119; 1916 Cal. LEXIS 462
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Sloss
- **Judges:** Sloss
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3302747

## Opinion text

SLOSS, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting an injunction
pendente Ute.
The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants, and we have this day filed an opinion affirming such judgment.
(Imperial Land Co.
v.
Imperial Irr. Dist., ante,
p. 668, [ 161 Pac. 116 ].)
The judgment on the merits, which now becomes final, ended the life of the temporary injunction. The defendants have, accordingly, secured every substantial benefit which they could obtain by a reversal of the order which they seek to review by the present appeal. The rights of the parties would not be affected in any way by either an affirmance or a reversal of such order. In this state of facts, the questions presented are merely moot or academic, and the court will not exercise its appellate jurisdiction for their decision.
(Foster
v.
Smith,
115 Cal. 611 , [ 47 Pac. 591 ];
Bradley
v.
Voorsanger,
143 Cal. 214 , [ 76 Pac. 1031 ].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3302747. Public record. Not legal advice.