# Dwinnell v. Dyer

> California Supreme Court · September 28, 1904 · 145 Cal. 12

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3301756

## Case

- **Full name:** G. W. DWINNELL, Respondent, v. W. F. DYER Et Al., Appellants
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 28, 1904
- **Citations:** 145 Cal. 12; 78 P. 247; 1904 Cal. LEXIS 537
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Beatty, Chipman, McFARLAND
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3301756

## Opinion text

I dissent, and adhere to the opinion heretofore rendered in Department. I think that the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed.
The following is the opinion rendered in Department Two on the 28th of April, 1904, adhered to in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice McFarland: —

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3301756. Public record. Not legal advice.