# Winchester v. Howard

> California Supreme Court · May 28, 1902 · 136 Cal. 432

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3300695

## Case

- **Full name:** JOSEPH WINCHESTER, Trustee, J. A. RICE, Substituted Trustee, Etc., Et Al., Appellants, v. BRYANT HOWARD Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 28, 1902
- **Citations:** 136 Cal. 432; 64 P. 692; 1902 Cal. LEXIS 732
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** McFARLAND, Temple, Van Dyke
- **Cited by:** 54 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3300695

## Opinion text

I dissent, and adhere to the former opinion. I think that the judgment should be affirmed.
The following is the opinion rendered by the court in Bank on April 6, 1901, and adopted by Justice McFarland: —

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3300695. Public record. Not legal advice.