# Shaeffer v. State Bar of Cal.

> California Supreme Court · April 30, 1934 · 220 Cal. 681

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3298884

## Case

- **Full name:** FRED A. SHAEFFER, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 30, 1934
- **Citations:** 220 Cal. 681; 32 P.2d 140; 1934 Cal. LEXIS 587
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Langdon
- **Judges:** , Langdon, Seawell
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3298884

## Opinion text

LANGDON, J., Dissenting.
I dissent. I am convinced that the record before us is insufficient to enable this court to do justice in this matter. The motion to remand the
*689
proceeding for the taking of further evidence should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3298884. Public record. Not legal advice.