# United States v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District, Stephen Brown v. Coffeeville Consolidated School District

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 10, 1975 · 520 F.2d 1405

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/329466

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COFFEEVILLE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-Appellants; Stephen BROWN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COFFEEVILLE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 10, 1975
- **Citations:** 520 F.2d 1405
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Wisdom, Coleman, Simpson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/329466

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
The Court notes, however, that the Petition for Rehearing raises what may be serious questions, not mentioned in our opinion, with reference to attorney fees and back pay. Those contentions need not be repeated here, for they will be available to the District Court. Upon remand, the District Court will consider those contentions in the light of the facts and the law as it presently exists. In the exercise of its sound discretion, it will decree accordingly.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/329466. Public record. Not legal advice.