# Rose v. Superior Court of Imperial Co.

> California Court of Appeal · January 21, 1927 · 80 Cal. App. 739

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3292389

## Case

- **Full name:** MARK ROSE, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF IMPERIAL COUNTY Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** January 21, 1927
- **Citations:** 80 Cal. App. 739; 252 P. 765; 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 928
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Craig
- **Judges:** Thompson, Craig
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3292389

## Opinion text

CRAIG, J., Dissenting.
I dissent, mainly because in my opinion, officers of an irrigation district are not subject to a proceeding of this nature.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 19, 1927.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3292389. Public record. Not legal advice.