# National Labor Relations Board v. Covington Furniture Manufacturing Company

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · April 28, 1975 · 514 F.2d 995

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/327026

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. COVINGTON FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 28, 1975
- **Citations:** 514 F.2d 995; 89 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3024; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14927
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Weick, Edwards, Engel
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/327026

## Opinion text

ORDER
On receipt and consideration of a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 212 N.L.R.B. No. 56 (1974); and
On review of the briefs and records in this proceeding and finding therein substantial evidence on the whole record to support the findings of fact of the Administrative Law Judge and the Board; and
Further noting that the legal conclusion arrived at by the Administrative Law Judge and the Board to the effect that the company’s insistence upon a penalty clause being added to an otherwise agreed upon contract represented insistence upon a nonmandatory subject where good faith bargaining had resulted in an agreement upon all mandatory subjects and was therefore unlawful; and
That said conclusion is directly supported by the Supreme Court’s opinion in NLRB v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 , 78 S.Ct. 718 , 2 L.Ed.2d 823 (1958). .
Now, therefore, the petition for enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/327026. Public record. Not legal advice.