# Pillans v. Hancock

> Supreme Court of Alabama · December 4, 1919 · 203 Ala. 570

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3254322

## Case

- **Full name:** PILLANS Et Al. v. HANCOCK Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** December 4, 1919
- **Citations:** 203 Ala. 570; 84 So. 757; 1919 Ala. LEXIS 84
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Anderson, Sayre, Somerville, Brown, Gardner, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3254322

## Opinion text

McCLELLAN, J.
(dissenting). Upon consideration of the several argued objections to the constitutionality of the act under review, I am of the opinion that such objections áre not well founded, and therefore that the act is not invalid.
GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3254322. Public record. Not legal advice.