# Brown v. State

> Alabama Court of Appeals · February 12, 1924 · 19 Ala. App. 574

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252876

## Case

- **Full name:** Brown v. State.
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 12, 1924
- **Citations:** 19 Ala. App. 574; 99 So. 156; 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 38
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Samford
- **Judges:** Samford
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252876

## Opinion text

SAMFORD, J.
Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and appeals.
The defendant has had a fair trial before a jury of his peers, who on their oaths say he is guilty. There was evidence from which an inference of guilt could be predicated. When this is the case, the appellate court is not justified in disturbing the verdict.
. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252876. Public record. Not legal advice.