# White v. State

> Alabama Court of Appeals · September 7, 1916 · 15 Ala. App. 197

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252245

## Case

- **Full name:** White v. the State
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 7, 1916
- **Citations:** 15 Ala. App. 197; 72 So. 771; 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 159
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Pelham
- **Judges:** Pelham
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252245

## Opinion text

PELHAM, P. J.
The recent cases of
Jim Ogles v. State, infra,
72 South. 598 , and
Ex parte E. M. Brown, infra,
72 South. 772 , in which opinions were rendered on August 1, 1916, (special August term, 1916), in effect dispose of the questions presented ' on this appeal adversely to the appellant’s contention.
(1)
The motions made by the defendant seeking to reach the defect were not the proper practice, and do not present the question. — Acts 1909, p. 315, § 23;
Thornton v. State,
4 Ala. App. 205 , 59 South. 234 ;
Swain v. State,
8 Ala. App. 28 , 62 South. 446 ;
Rector v. State,
11 Ala. App. 340 , 66 South. 857 .
(2, 3)
The only objection available to the defendant against the validity of the indictment on a plea in abatement is that the jurors who found the indictment were not drawn by the officers designated by law to draw them. Other grounds set up in the plea are not available. — Acts 1909, p. 315, § 23;
Spivey v. State,
172 Ala. 391 , 56 South. 232 ;
Swain v. State,
8 Ala. App. 26 , 62 South. 446 . This ground of objection is not sustained by the proof. The minute entry recites that the jury was drawn by the •judge of the court, the officer designated by law. — Acts 1909, p. 310, § 15. A recital that all the jurors “had been regularly drawn according to law” is sufficient to show that the jurors were drawn by the officer designated by
law.
— Swain
v. State,
8 Ala. App. 26, 28 , 62 South. 446 .
(4)
The judge of the Morgan county law and equity court has all the powers conferred upon circuit judges in ordering adjournments of court, and the adjourned term being but a continuation of the regular term, the jurors may be, on appropriate order (as was shown to have been done in this' case), carried over to the adjourned term, at which- the court may exercise all the authority and jurisdiction it could exercise at a regular term.
—Town of Athens v. Miller,
190 Ala. 88 , 66 South. 702 ;
Ogles v. State
and
Ex parte Brown, supra,
August, 1916, special term;
*199
Whatley v. State,
144 Ala. 74 , 39 South. 1014 ;
Ashford v. McKee,
183 Ala. 620 , 62 South. 879 .
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3252245. Public record. Not legal advice.