# In Re Fite

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 9, 1933 · 228 Ala. 4

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3251987

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re Fite.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 9, 1933
- **Citations:** 228 Ala. 4; 152 So. 246; 1933 Ala. LEXIS 27
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Anderson, Gardner, Bouldin, Poster, Knight, Thomas, Brown, Thompson
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3251987

## Opinion text

On Rehearing.
PER. CURIAM.
Oix further consideration the court is of opinion that a sentence of suspension- of the appellant from the practice of the profession for eighteen months, beginning on October 12, 1933, and ending April 12, 1935, is adequate punishment to be imposed in this case.
The judgmeixt of the bar commission is, therefore, modified so as to suspend and restrain the appellant from the practice of-law, as above indicated.
Judgment modified; application overruled.
All the Justices concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3251987. Public record. Not legal advice.