# Henderson v. Rummage

> Supreme Court of Alabama · May 12, 1927 · 216 Ala. 692

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246553

## Case

- **Full name:** M. M. HENDERSON Et Al. v. Nancy E. RUMMAGE
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** May 12, 1927
- **Citations:** 216 Ala. 692; 112 So. 917
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Gardner
- **Judges:** Bouldin, Brown, Gardner, Sayre
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246553

## Opinion text

*693
GARDNER, J.
This cause is analogous to that of Willis v. Rummage, 214 Ala. 313 , 107 So. 864 , the same testimony being used in each case by agreement of counsel, and involving the same questions of law and fact. The decision of this court, therefore, in Willis v. Rummage, supra, if followed, is here controlling. We have examined the record with care, and do not consider that further discussion would serve any useful purpose. Suffice it to say that upon due consideration we are not of the opinion the case of Willis v. Rummage was incorrectly decided, and have concluded to adhere thereto. It results upon that authority the decree here must be reversed, and one here rendered dismissing the bill. Reversed and rendered.
SAYRE, BOULDIN, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246553. Public record. Not legal advice.