# Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence

> Supreme Court of Alabama · October 4, 1934 · 229 Ala. 351

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246207

## Case

- **Full name:** Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** October 4, 1934
- **Citations:** 229 Ala. 351; 157 So. 79
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Anderson, Thomas, Knight
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246207

## Opinion text

BROWN, Justice.
The petitioner was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Florence for violating a municipal ordinance, and appealed to the law and equity court of Florence, where his appeal was dismissed on motion of the city, and from that judgment he appealed to ;the
*352
Court of Appeals and submitted bis case without assignment of errors on the record, where the judgment was affirmed. Pie then applied for a rehearing and his application was stricken.
The law is well settled that an assignment of errors is essential to properly present questions on such appeals. Perry v. State, 1 Ala. App. 253 , 55 So. 1035 ; Craig v. City of Birmingham, 14 Ala. App. 630 , 71 So. 983 ; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4 , 109 So. 571 . The affirmance of the judgment of the law and equity court hy the Court of Appeals was, therefore, free from error, and the writ of certiorari is due to he denied and the petition dismissed.
Writ denied; petition dismissed.
ANDERSON, O. X, and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
<®=>For other oases see same topic and KEY NUMBER in all- Key Number Digests and Indexes

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246207. Public record. Not legal advice.