# Brown v. State

> Supreme Court of Alabama · February 17, 1938 · 235 Ala. 360

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246076

## Case

- **Full name:** Brown v. State.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** February 17, 1938
- **Citations:** 235 Ala. 360; 179 So. 262; 1938 Ala. LEXIS 222
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Foster
- **Judges:** Anderson, Bouldin, Foster, Gardner
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246076

## Opinion text

FOSTER, Justice.
There is no principle of law declared in the opinion of the Court of Appeals which is sought to be reviewed. The only matter discussed is whether the record shows sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice. The corroborating evidence is not set out in the opinion.
It is t not our province on certiorari to go through the record and search for the corroborating evidence, to determine whether it is sufficient. We have so held many times. The opinion is not open for review on the point argued.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3246076. Public record. Not legal advice.