# Holt v. City of Mobile

> Alabama Court of Appeals · November 26, 1918 · 16 Ala. App. 597

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3237513

## Case

- **Full name:** Holt v. City of Mobile.
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** November 26, 1918
- **Citations:** 16 Ala. App. 597; 80 So. 171; 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 272
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3237513

## Opinion text

BROWN, P. J.
The only question presented on the record is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to authorize the judgment of conviction. There was some evidence tending to show that the defendant was in charge of the place where the officers found liquor stored, and in a building that was not used exclusively for a dwelling, Jones v. Montgomery, ante, p. 357, 77 South. 969 ; Conner v. State, ante, p. 452, 78 South. 715 ; Holt v. State, ante, p. 399, 78 South. 315 .
The testimony was given ore tenus before the court, sitting without a jury, and we are unable to say from the evidence in the record that the conclusion of the trial court is plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Union Mut. Aid Ass’n of Mobile v. Carroway, 201 Ala. 414 , 78 South. 732 ; Smith v. Thomas, 201 Ala. 442 , 78 South. 820 ; Mulligan v. State, 15 Ala. App. 204 , 72 South. 761 .
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3237513. Public record. Not legal advice.