# Cunningham v. State

> Alabama Court of Appeals · May 8, 1917 · 16 Ala. App. 140

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235885

## Case

- **Full name:** Cunningham v. State.
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 8, 1917
- **Citations:** 16 Ala. App. 140; 75 So. 816; 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 198
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235885

## Opinion text

BROWN, P. J.
[1]
Tbe indictment is in tbe form prescribed by tbe statute and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled.
[2]
Tbe defendant’s plea of former jeopardy was not sufficient, in that it did not show whether tbe former trial of tbe defendant was for the violation of the statute, or a municipal ordinance, and tbe demurrer thereto was sustained without error. Bell v. State, ante, p. 36, 75 South. 181 .
There is no error in tbe record, and tbe judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235885. Public record. Not legal advice.