# Inge v. State

> Supreme Court of Alabama · January 20, 1938 · 235 Ala. 280

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235493

## Case

- **Full name:** Inge v. State.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** January 20, 1938
- **Citations:** 235 Ala. 280; 178 So. 454; 1938 Ala. LEXIS 26
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Anderson, Brown, Knight, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235493

## Opinion text

BROWN, Justice.
. The rules of law declared in Ex parte Grimmett, 228 Ala. 1 , 152 So. 263 , are supported by sound reasons and unimpeachable authority. The responsibility of applying the law as there declared rests upon courts upon which the law confers jurisdiction to apply the law to the facts of the particular case.
The Court of Appeals has exercised thnt authority without stating the evidence in extenso, by holding that the evidence admitted on the trial was not sufficient to justify a submission of the case to the jury, and, under the well-settled rules of review by certiorari, the writ' is due to be denied. Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420 , 71 So. 91 . It is so ordered.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3235493. Public record. Not legal advice.