# Fitts v. Commission of City of Birmingham

> Supreme Court of Alabama · January 21, 1932 · 224 Ala. 600

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3224331

## Case

- **Full name:** FITTS v. COMMISSION OF CITY OF BIRMINGHAM Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** January 21, 1932
- **Citations:** 224 Ala. 600; 141 So. 354; 1932 Ala. LEXIS 133
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Foster
- **Judges:** Anderson, Foster, Thomas, Brown, Knight
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3224331

## Opinion text

FOSTER, J.
(concurring).
My concurrence is based upon the statement of the nature of the services of the attorneys as expressed in the opinion, and not upon the averments of the bill, upon the theory that the argument of counsel was confined to the question thus stated.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3224331. Public record. Not legal advice.