# Daniel v. Ormand

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 27, 1935 · 231 Ala. 10

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3223634

## Case

- **Full name:** Russ Daniel v. Julius Ormand.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 27, 1935
- **Citations:** 231 Ala. 10; 163 So. 362; 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Anderson, Thomas, Bouldin
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3223634

## Opinion text

BROWN, Justice.
The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.
At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.
The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506 , 80 So. 794 ; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409 , 32 So. 10 ; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70 , 82 So. 28 ; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521 , 93 So. 395 .
The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3223634. Public record. Not legal advice.