# Allgood v. Parker

> Alabama Court of Appeals · February 16, 1926 · 21 Ala. App. 273

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3221846

## Case

- **Full name:** ALLGOOD, State Auditor, v. PARKER Et Al.
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 16, 1926
- **Citations:** 21 Ala. App. 273; 107 So. 326; 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 63
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Samford
- **Judges:** Samford
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3221846

## Opinion text

SAMFORD, J.
Sections 375 and 376, Acts 1919, p. 445, are not materially different from, and are practically the same as Code 1907, § 2411, as amended by Act of the Legislature, Sp. Sess. 1909, pp. 165, 166, and section 2412, and considered in the case of Lovelady v. Loveman, Joseph
&
Loeb, 68 So. 48 , 191 Ala. 96 . The judge of probate, upon petition regularly filed, having issued his certificate in accordance with section 876 of the Act of 1919, p. 445, and' this court being bound by the decision in the Lovelady Case, supra, we must hold that the trial court did not commit error in granting the writ as prayed. See Turner v. Anniston Elec. & Gas Co., 75 So. 465 , 200 Ala. 89 ; Board of Rev. v. Sou. Bell T. & T. Co., 76 So. 858 , 200 Ala. 532 .
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3221846. Public record. Not legal advice.