# Michael A. Valenti v. Kentucky Bar Association

> Kentucky Supreme Court · May 5, 2016 · 486 S.W.3d 870

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3200757

## Case

- **Full name:** Michael A. VALENTI, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent
- **Court:** Kentucky Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 5, 2016
- **Citations:** 486 S.W.3d 870; 2016 Ky. LEXIS 182; 2016 WL 2605246
- **Opinion:** Opinion by Minton Jr.
- **Judges:** Minton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3200757

## Opinion text

TO BE PUBLISHED

°Sum= C,*ourf of TArtifuritv
2016-SC-000109-KB

MICHAEL A. VALENTI MOVANT

V. IN SUPREME COURT

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RESPONDENT

(

OPINION AND ORDER

Michael A. Valentil commingled personal funds with client funds in his

firm's IOLTA escrow account. Valenti self-reported this professional-ethics

violation to the Kentucky Bar Association, and the parties have reached an

agreed resolution.

Over a two-and-one-half-year period, Valenti misused client funds via six

separate disbursements, ranging in amounts from $1,544.40 to $10,440.00.

In addition, Valenti authorized checks representing his own personal funds

totaling $182,585.81 to be deposited into the IOLTA escrow account of his firm,

Valenti Hanley 86 Robinson, PLLC. This IOLTA escrow account also contained

client funds. Of these deposited funds, $173,678.00 were obtained through

Valenti's firm's profit-sharing plan. Valenti used the funds to pay personal

expenses. Of note, before Valenti self-reported, all client funds were restored.

1 KBA Member No. 81989, bar roster address, One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1950,
401 W. Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202. Valenti was admitted to the practice
of law on April 24, 1987.
1
Valenti admits his conduct violated Kentucky Supreme Court Rule (SCR)

3.130-1.5(a), which provides:

"A lawyer shall hold property of clients or third persons that is in a
lawyer's possession in a separate account maintained in the state
where the lawyer's office is situated, or elsewhere with the consent
of the client, third person, or both in the event of a claim by each
to the property. The separate account referred to in the preceding
sentence shall be maintained in a bank which has agreed to notify
the Kentucky Bar Association in the event that any overdraft
occurs in the account. Other property shall be identified and
safeguarded."

Under SCR 3.480(2), Valenti and the KBA agreed to the imposition of

discipline and now ask this Court to impose upon him a suspension from the

practice of law for thirty days, to be probated for a one-year period. The terms

of the probation require Valenti to attend, at his own expense, the next

scheduled Ethics and Professionalism Enhancement Program (EPEP) offered by

the Office of Bar Counsel (OBC) within twelve months following the entry of this

Opinion and Order. Valenti will not be allowed to apply for CLE credit of any

kind for this program and must furnish a release and waiver to the OBC to

allow the OBC to verify he has not reported any such hours to the CLE

Commission. In addition, Valenti must satisfy all CLE requirements and timely

pay his KBA membership dues. And Valenti will pay the costs of these

proceedings.

In the event Valenti fails to comply with any of the terms of discipline

stated here, upon motion of the OBC, this Court may impose the entire thirty-

day suspension.

After reviewing the record, the standards, and other relevant authorities,

this Court concludes that the discipline proposed by Valenti is adequate.

2
Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1) Michael A. Valenti, KBA Member No. 81981, is guilty of the charge

alleged in KBA File No. 23365;

2) Valenti will be suspended from the practice of law for a period of thirty

days for violating SCR 3.130-1.15(a);

3) The entirety of Valenti's suspension will be probated for one year,

subject to the conditions set forth here;

4) If Valenti fails to comply with any of the terms of discipline as set

forth here, upon the OBC's motion, the Court will impose the thirty-

day suspension;

5) In accordance with SCR 3.370, Valenti is directed to pay $57.10, the

cost associated with this proceeding, for which execution may issue

from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order.

All sitting. All concur.

ENTERED: May 5, 2016.

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3200757. Public record. Not legal advice.
