# National Labor Relations Board v. Lunday-Thagard Oil Company

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · June 19, 1974 · 496 F.2d 1195

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/319221

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LUNDAY-THAGARD OIL COMPANY, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 19, 1974
- **Citations:** 496 F.2d 1195
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Ely, Carter, East
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/319221

## Opinion text

OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The record does not support the respondent’s contention that it was deprived of significant procedural rights.
See
the Board’s Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.69 (c.) (1973);
see also
NLRB v. Singleton Packing Corp., 418 F.2d 275, 280 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed. 2d 53 (1970); Sonoco Products Co. v. NLRB, 399 F.2d 835, 839 (9th Cir. 1968); NLRB v. J. R. Simplot Co., 322 F.2d 170, 172 (9th Cir. 1963). Upon the basis of the record and the Petitioner’s Decision and Order, reported at 203 NLRB No. 12 , the challenged Order will be
Enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/319221. Public record. Not legal advice.