# United States v. Raymond Brown, Jr.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 31, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3190516

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 31, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3190516

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND N. BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond N. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward
Bradenham, II, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Amy Elizabeth Cross, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Kristine Elizabeth Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Gurney Wingate Grant, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Raymond N. Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

granting in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Brown, No.

4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-11 (E.D. Va. June 3, 2015). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3190516. Public record. Not legal advice.