# Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · March 29, 2016 · 635 Pa. 207

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3189633

## Case

- **Full name:** Cal HEIDELBERG Jr., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 29, 2016
- **Citations:** 635 Pa. 207; 133 A.3d 737; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 547; 2016 WL 1223495
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** per curiam
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3189633

## Opinion text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT

CAL HEIDELBERG JR., : No. 26 WAP 2015
:
Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the
: Commonwealth Court entered October
: 26, 2015 at No. 494 MD 2015.
v. :
:
:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF :
PROBATION AND PAROLE, :
:
Appellee :

ORDER

PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the

Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwealth Court for further

consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an

appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth

Court’s appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint

in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a

governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that

determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3189633. Public record. Not legal advice.