# Tojuanna Brown v. Terence McAuliffe

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 29, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3181123

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 29, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3181123

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2533

TOJUANNA RHEUNEA BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TERENCE RICHARD MCAULIFFE, Governor et al Commonwealth of
Virginia; BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, President et al Federal
United States of America,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District
Judge. (3:15-cv-00542-MHL)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tojuanna Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Tojuanna Rheunea Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Brown v. McAuliffe, No. 3:15-cv-00542-MHL (E.D.

Va. Nov. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3181123. Public record. Not legal advice.