# Christie Brown v. Top Guard

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 19, 2016

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3170492

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 19, 2016
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3170492

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2054

CHRISTIE G. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TOP GUARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00470-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christie G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Childers North,
LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia; Gabriel Alexander
Walker, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Christie G. Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her employment discrimination claim and

denying her motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Top Guard,

No. 2:14-cv-00470-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. May 29, 2015; Aug. 27,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3170492. Public record. Not legal advice.