# In Re: Google Inc Cookie Place v.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · November 12, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3154157

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** November 12, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3154157

## Opinion text

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_______________

No. 13-4300
_______________

IN RE: GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT
CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION

William Gourley; Jose M. Bermudez; Nicholas Todd Heinrich; Lynne Krause,

Appellants
_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Delaware
(No. 1-12-md-02358)
District Judge: Honorable Sue L. Robinson
_______________

Argued December 11, 2014

Before: FUENTES, FISHER, and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges

____________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
____________

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed
November 10, 2015, be amended as follows:

The second sentence of the first paragraph on Page 16, which read:

For the following reasons, we will vacate the dismissal of the plaintiffs’
Wiretap Act claim but affirm the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims under
the Stored Communications Act and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
shall read:

For the following reasons, we will affirm the dismissal of the plaintiffs’
Wiretap Act claim as well as the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims under the
Stored Communications Act and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

This amendment does not change the filing date of the judgment or the original
opinion.

BY THE COURT,

s/ Julio M. Fuentes
Circuit Judge

DATED: November 12, 2015
SLC/cc: Counsel of Record

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3154157. Public record. Not legal advice.