# Piper Rountree v. Tammy Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 5, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3152536

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 5, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3152536

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6655

PIPER A. ROUNTREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TAMMY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD CLARK; JOHN JABE; WENDY HOBBS; D. RADCLIFF-WALKER; T.
COX; K. STAPLETON; D. CARTER; P. SOUKOP; MS. SWANN; S. HORN;
V. BOOKER; GENE JOHNSON; MS. SNOW; J. BLAND,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: October 30, 2015 Decided: November 5, 2015

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Piper A. Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
PER CURIAM:

Piper A. Rountree appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and her

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Brown, No.

7:11-cv-00572-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2015; Mar. 26, 2015).

We deny Rountree’s motion for transcripts at the government’s

expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3152536. Public record. Not legal advice.