# Brown, Arthur Jr.

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · October 28, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3150072

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 28, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3150072

## Opinion text

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-26,178-03

EX PARTE ARTHUR BROWN, JR.

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 636535-B IN THE 351ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. K ELLER, P.J., dissents.

ORDER

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, § 5.

In November 1993, Applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed
Brown - 2

Applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Brown v. State, No. AP-71,817 (Tex.

Crim. App. December 18, 1996). This Court denied relief on Applicant’s initial post-

conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Brown, No. WR-26,178-02 (Tex.

Crim. App. June 18, 2008).1 Applicant’s instant post-conviction application for writ of

habeas corpus was filed in the trial court on November 3, 2014.

In his application, Applicant alleges prosecutorial misconduct (Claim A) and

ineffective assistance of counsel (Claim B). Within Claim A, Applicant alleges that State’s

witness C. E. Anderson “testified falsely or in a materially misleading manner when he

expressed his unequivocal opinion that the evidence bullets were fired from the two guns that

the State recovered in Alabama and tied to [Applicant].” We have reviewed the application

and find that this particular allegation satisfies the requirements of Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure Article 11.071, § 5(a). Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for

consideration of the allegation that Anderson gave false or misleading testimony at

Applicant’s trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 28 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.

Do Not Publish

1
Ex parte Brown, No. WR-26,178-01, was an application for writ of mandamus, which
this Court denied leave to file on March 23, 1994.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3150072. Public record. Not legal advice.