# Jorge Chapa v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 19, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3125475

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** January 19, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3125475

## Opinion text

Opinion issued January
19, 2012.
In
The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of
Texas
NO. 01-11-00677-CR
____________
JORGA CHAPA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 184th
District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1233509
MEMORANDUM
OPINION
Appellant,
Jorge Chapa, pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery. The trial court found appellant guilty, and,
in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the
State, sentenced appellant to 12 years’ confinement. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
In a plea bargain case, a defendant
may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and
ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal
must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right
of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(d).
Here, the trial court’s certification
is included in the record on appeal. See
id . The trial court’s certification
states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(a)(2). Appellant did not appeal any
pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for appellant to
appeal. The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because
appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez
v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals,
while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained
is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal
without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction. All pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices
Higley and Brown.
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3125475. Public record. Not legal advice.