# James Lopez v. Vanessa Lopez

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · May 17, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3123547

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** May 17, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3123547

## Opinion text

Opinion issued May 17, 2012.
In The
Court of
Appeals
For The
First District
of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-11-00291-CV
———————————
JAMES LOPEZ , Appellant
V.
VANESSA
LOPEZ , Appellee
On
Appeal from the 280th District Court
Harris
County, Texas
Trial
Court Cause No. 1108992
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, James Lopez, has neither established
indigence nor paid all the required fees.
See Tex. R. App. P.
5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing
requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (Vernon
Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals);
Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts
of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc.
Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted
in Tex. R. App. P . app. A §
B( 1) (listing fees in court of appeals).
On May 27, 2011, the Court notified appellant that the appeal was
subject to dismissal if he did not respond within 10 days. See Tex.
R. App. P. 5 (allowing
enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). T he notice was returned as
undeliverable.
A pro se appellant is required to
keep this Court apprised of his current mailing address. See
Tex. R. App. P. 6.3(c), 9.1(b).
Because appellant has failed to pay
the filing fee and has failed to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure,
we dismiss the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P . 5, 9.1(b),
37.3(b), and 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel
consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3123547. Public record. Not legal advice.